diamondintherough: (sometimes i get these migraines..)
Danny Archer ([personal profile] diamondintherough) wrote2010-03-27 10:50 pm

04,

[Filtered to all HUMANS (non-vampire, non-Time Lord, etc); ask if not certain]
We've been out of blood for the beasts for some time, huh? What's to stop us from just not feeding them anymore? Can't we lock them up and just let them starve? They live forever, all right? So there'd be no "death toll" or worry of them coming back. We just lock them up and let them starve like the monsters they are.

Why is everyone treating them like they're some kind of humans, huh? I could say the same about some of the other creatures here too, but they haven't become dangerous yet.

[Filter]

[identity profile] hopeless-hacker.livejournal.com 2010-03-29 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
They have been no attacks for the past four days. More of the vampire population have spoken out against further attacks than have made threats. So at present, my answer to your question would be: they aren't.

[Filter]

[identity profile] diamondtherough.livejournal.com 2010-03-29 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
Four days? That's good to you people? And I thought I came from a dangerous territory. You people are craze, all right?

Four days is nothing and it doesn't make a person any less dangerous. Hell, it means they could be planning some great fucking scheme, huh? I won't ever trust them, but I'm not the type to attack them on my own. I'm going to make you people realize how dangerous they are.

[Filter]

[identity profile] hopeless-hacker.livejournal.com 2010-03-29 08:18 am (UTC)(link)
Four days is progress. If there are more attacks because of the blood supply issues then I will review my position. And I'd like to point out that over the last few months, the violence perpetrated by vampires is as nothing compared to the violence carried out by humans in terms of quantity and brutality - not to satisfy a real physical need but out of anger, casual sadism or bloody-minded boredom. Has anyone suggested that every human be locked away indefinitely? No, because it's recognised that some humans are worse than others and some have developed control over violent urges they showed up here with. But for some reason it's impossible for some people to extend the same courtesy to vampires.

You say you won't attack them, but what you will do is contribute to an atmosphere of high tension and encourage a sense of 'us' versus 'them' which will lead to more violence on both sides. That is not better.

[Filter]

[identity profile] diamondtherough.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Give me a list, then, of all those that have severely harmed or killed another person in the last month, huh? Then I'll rethink my position... I said we can only lock away the violent vampires instead, huh? Let the violent humans join them if you want, but humans are predictable. Vampires are not.

Only if we're on the losing side, my friend.
Edited 2010-03-30 21:56 (UTC)